Anchoring Bias
Anchoring bias is relying too heavily on the first number or idea you hear, even when it is arbitrary.
Deep dives into logic, cognitive biases, and the art of debate.
Choose a path and build your critical-thinking toolkit.
Patterns in thinking that quietly distort judgment and decisions.
Argument flaws that make conclusions feel true without earning them.
Claims that sound scientific but skip the rigor of real evidence.
Anchoring bias is relying too heavily on the first number or idea you hear, even when it is arbitrary.
The availability heuristic is judging probability based on what is easiest to recall, not what is most likely.
A practical cognitive biases list with clear definitions and links to detailed guides.
Confirmation bias is the tendency to notice and trust evidence that supports what we already believe.
The Dunning-Kruger effect is when low skill creates high confidence because people lack awareness of their gaps.
Cognitive biases are predictable thinking shortcuts that distort judgment. Learn why they happen, how they show up, and how to reduce their impact.
Survivorship bias focuses on visible successes while ignoring the many failures that are not seen.
Learn what the ad hominem fallacy is, see real-life examples, and understand why attacking a person instead of the argument leads to weak reasoning.
The ambiguity fallacy relies on vague or shifting meanings to make an argument appear valid.
Learn what the anecdotal fallacy is, see a real-life example, and understand why one personal story isn’t the same as real evidence.
Learn what the appeal to authority fallacy is, see a simple real-life example, and understand why a claim needs evidence, not just a famous name.
The appeal to emotion fallacy uses feelings as the primary evidence instead of reasons or facts.
An appeal to fear tries to persuade by frightening people rather than presenting evidence.
An appeal to ignorance claims something is true because it has not been proven false (or vice versa).
The appeal to nature fallacy assumes something is good or right simply because it is natural.
The appeal to tradition fallacy argues something is right because it has always been done that way.
Learn what the bandwagon fallacy is, see simple real-life examples, and understand why popularity is not the same as proof or evidence.
The burden of proof fallacy shifts the responsibility to disprove a claim instead of proving it.
Circular reasoning uses the conclusion as one of its premises, providing no independent support.
The composition fallacy assumes what is true of parts must be true of the whole.
The correlation vs causation fallacy assumes that because two things move together, one causes the other.
The division fallacy assumes what is true of the whole must be true of each part.
Equivocation shifts the meaning of a key word or phrase to make an argument seem valid.
A false analogy compares two things that are not similar in the ways that matter.
The false cause fallacy assumes a causal relationship without adequate evidence.
A false dilemma fallacy presents only two options when more possibilities exist, forcing an unnecessary choice.
The gambler's fallacy assumes past random events make a future outcome more likely.
The genetic fallacy judges a claim based on its source rather than its evidence.
Learn what the hasty generalization fallacy is, see simple real-life examples, and understand how one bad experience can lead to faulty conclusions.
Logical fallacies are predictable reasoning errors that make weak arguments feel strong. Learn the core patterns, why they work, and how to respond.
A complete logical fallacies list with clear definitions, links to detailed guides, and a roadmap for practicing critical thinking.
The middle ground fallacy assumes a compromise is always correct simply because it is between two extremes.
Moving the goalposts changes the criteria for success after those criteria have been met.
The no true Scotsman fallacy redefines a group to exclude counterexamples and protect a claim.
Post hoc fallacy assumes that because one event followed another, the first caused the second.
A red herring distracts from the original issue by introducing an irrelevant point or changing the subject.
A slippery slope claims a small step will inevitably lead to extreme outcomes without evidence.
Learn what the straw man fallacy is, see simple real-life examples, and understand how misrepresenting an argument makes weak reasoning look strong.
The Texas sharpshooter fallacy cherry-picks data that fits a pattern while ignoring the rest.
Tu quoque dismisses a claim by accusing the speaker of hypocrisy instead of addressing the argument.

Milano Cortina 2026 drew global attention—dual flames, huge crowds, nonstop commentary. Here’s what it reveals about narratives, fallacies, and clear thinking.

From office meetings to family chats and grocery store debates, real-life arguments are full of predictable fallacies. Learn the patterns, examples, and calm responses.

Political leaders often rely on predictable fallacies—straw man, false dilemmas, whataboutism, and fear appeals—to persuade quickly. Learn the patterns and defenses.
Pseudoscience imitates science without following its methods. Learn the red flags, why it spreads, and how to respond.
A practical guide to telling science from pseudoscience using testability, transparency, and evidence quality.
A practical checklist of warning signs that a claim is science-like but not scientific.